His videos do repeat the same things. I imagine he is recycling his ideas for separate audiences.
Having said that much of what he is saying comes from research done by others and seems to me to be quite sound.
Much of what he says is taken from the writings of Christian O'Brien who was apparently a leading surveyor in the oil industry and who later became a self taught linguist in order to translate for himself ancient texts.
http://www.goldenageproject.org.uk/obrienvsitchin.phpImmanuel Velikovsky in his book Worlds in Collision put forward the idea that some kind of cosmic catastrophe had a devastating effect on the earth. Unfortunately his book was published at the height of the 'red scare' in America and everybody associated with his ideas suffered as a result.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_VelikovskyThe idea put forward in these videos is that the earth was hit by something so big that it tilted on its axis. This caused land masses and ice sheets to shift very quickly. The bodies of mammoths have been dug up in Siberia for a long time. The fact that they had tropical plants in their mouths shows that at their death the climate was very warm and became freezing cold in an instant. Drowning animals, including mammoths, would have been quickly disposed of by fish I would imagine if it was all part of the normal cycle of life and death.
Surviving humans had to regroup and make the best of what was left for them to survive. This would have meant among other things keeping an eye on what was coming towards the earth. The fire and brimstone etc of the Bible was not the work of a vengeful God but of interplanetary debris. We still get this stuff coming in as we saw last year with the fireball over Russia.
What is interesting about his talks is the pointing out of the massive stone buildings built at a very early age. How they managed to cut and move and build stones weighing hundreds of tons is something we can't explain under normal accepted history. After all we are talking about stone age hunter gatherers living in caves aren't we?
Other posts on this site have mentioned the early surveyors, Michael etc. Even documentary sources and early maps show that somebody was responsible for mapping Europe and other parts of the world at a very early age. This must have taken a great deal of organisation as well as the skills and knowledge needed for this work. The Pirei Reis map is only one of many such maps.
The idea is that before the catastrophe there was an advanced civilisation which collapsed following the natural disaster but the survivors would have remembered what they had been capable of before. I wonder how we would cope today if something really devastating happened on a global scale? Food and shelter first and then what?
What we are told in official history and what is taught in schools is that there was an ice age, our ancestors were extremely primitive cavemen (and women) and over the past ten thousand years have struggled bit by bit to get to the dizzy heights of our wonderful technicalogical civilisation.
If it took ten thousand years for this to happen what were they doing for the hundreds of thousands of years before?
Modern researchers are digging up lost cities and civilisations all over the world as well as discovering underwater cities. I think that this man and those he quotes are looking back at ancient texts to remove the superstition and religion associated with them to look at them from a more logical point of view. This gets rid of gods and spacemen.
His conclusions may be wrong but I think that opening the debate up to fresh ideas could only be a good thing if we really want to discover what went on in the past.