Well, I a not a Civil Engineer. Neither am I an Architect. But I'm pretty damn sure that none of 'em would design and build any aesthetically pleasing building without a very thorough knowledge of geometry. And an understanding of all the classic forms of architecture (Doric etc) depends on understanding the differences in their geometric rules.
Alas, all the finest buildings of antiquity were done without a knowledge of geometry. Euclid lived much later, if at all. If you would care to name an English builder/architect/civil engineer of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries who had studied geometry, I'd be obliged. After that it is impossible to say because geometry was compulsorily taught to everyone so it is impossible to say whether they used geometry or not. (They didn't.)
Even with t'interweb technology, geometry has a crucial role to play. Minimum radius of optical-fibre plumbing is a geometric issue. So is the layout of integrated circuits and microprocessors.
Sorry, old chum, it isn't. A minimum radius is not a geometric question but, again, one of trial and error measurement. I played the triangle in my infant school band but that didn't mean I knew how many degrees the angles added up to. It's 360 for those still at infants school.