Megalithic mapping

Current topics

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby Boreades » 5:01 pm

Mick Harper wrote:Now where?


Going outside to browse fractional latitudes.

Thirds
1/3 = 30 deg
2/3 = 60 deg

Quarters
1/4 = 22.5 deg
2/4 = 45 deg
3/4 = 67.5 deg

Fifths
1/5 = 18 deg
2/5 = 36 deg
3/5 = 54 deg
4/5 = 72 deg

Sixths
1/6 = 15 deg
3/6 = 45 deg
5/6 = 75 deg
Even sixths are same as 1/3rds

Sevenths
3/7 = 42.85 deg
4/7 = 57.14 deg
5/7 = 71.42 deg

Eighths and ninths can wait til later.
I may be some time.
Boreades
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby jon » 5:26 pm

Giza is 1/3rd (30 degrees) of the 90 degree quadrant (equator to pole)
Thebes is 2/7ths (25.7 deg)
Avebury is 4/7ths (51.42 deg) or 360/7


Cool isn't it?

Newgrange is 5/8
So is Thornborough

And there's more than just these.
jon
 
Posts: 108
Joined: 8:51 am

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby Boreades » 8:48 pm

jon wrote:Newgrange is 5/8
So is Thornborough


Err, howzat?

Sorry, I didn't think Newgrange and Thornborough were on the same latitude.

But glad to hear of any more!
Boreades
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby jon » 8:12 am

Ah.. sorry, thinking of wrong set. 5/8 is the Edinburgh area.

It's 3/5
(3/5* 90 = 54)

Thornborough Henge,
54 12 N, 01 35 E

Newgrange:
53 42 N 6 29 E

Both within a few minutes of 54: 3/5

(had to edit this.. wrote 5/8 again.. must be fixated on this)
jon
 
Posts: 108
Joined: 8:51 am

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby Boreades » 9:37 am

jon wrote:(had to edit this.. wrote 5/8 again.. must be fixated on this)

Is that where Firsprofen is?
Boreades
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby Mick Harper » 11:12 am

I wish you two would let the rest of us in on the secret.
Mick Harper
 
Posts: 910
Joined: 10:28 am

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby macausland » 1:18 pm

I'm not sure what the rules of this game are but I'll join in if you don't mind.

There are a few in north Yorkshire on the 54 degree line.( I don't know how to do that artistic degree circle.)

Roseberry Topping 54 deg. 30' 15.6N. 1 degree 6' 26.44"W

Roseberry Topping, thought to be an artificial pyramid by an American archaelogist, was associated with Odin, St Oswald and magic wells on the top as well as a source of iron ore.

Whorl Hill. 54 deg. 41541 N -1degree . 26006 Longitude

Freebrough Hill 54 degrees 50449 (or 54degrees 30'15.6 N) depending on source. -0 degrees 93623 Long

These three seem to follow a north east line with Whorl Hill in the south west and Freebrough Hill in the north east.

Nearby is Blakey Topping at 54degrees 19.4243N or 54degrees 328712N and 0degrees 39'39'W

I hope it means something to someone. Blakey Topping has a stone circle.
macausland
 
Posts: 339
Joined: 3:17 pm

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby jon » 1:55 pm

Is that where Firsprofen is?


The trouble with Firsprofen is that it is seriously vulnerable. But it's the one that more or less seals the deal for the ME theory (for reasons related to what you have worked out above). Trouble is, what exists in the way of evidence, if it even exists, could be easily destroyed (and anyway I wouldn't have a clue what I was looking at even if I went to investigate). As far as I'm aware, no archaeologist has ever looked at it, but it's not protected in any way and would be easy to contaminate if not done in the right sequence.

So at this stage I have to wait it out and see if the Scottish Heritage authorities take an interest. Weird given that I've no idea if any evidence exists at that location.


Hey Mick

I wish you two would let the rest of us in on the secret.


Take a look at the first post on this tread on the MP Mick:
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php ... 12&forum=4
jon
 
Posts: 108
Joined: 8:51 am

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby Boreades » 11:37 pm

Hello playmates.

What I'm attempting to do is reverse engineer some basic Megalithic Astro-Geometry. The original Megalithic Astro-Geometry Initiates (let call them MAGI) understood triangular coordinates. Just as the original Ordnance Survey used triangulation to map the whole of the UK, I am hypothesising that the MAGI would use the same to establish some base stations for astronomy. The base stations do have to be far enough apart to maximise (for example) the difference in the maximum height of ascension of any astronomical object.

As we are all Sleep Walkers, stumbling in the dark, fumbling to understand what's gone before, I'm trying to take a systemic approach, and run the number down.
e.g.
Image

Your mission (should you decide to accept it) is to scour the globe for seriously suggestive sites that have the same latitudes.
Boreades
 
Posts: 2081
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Megalithic mapping

Postby macausland » 9:25 am

Hello Arthur

Am I right in thinking that the numbers under the fractional headings refer to lines of latitude?

By the way, there is a theory that we don't actually go round the sun as such but follow the sun in a spiralling orbit as the sun itself moves along its orbit within the galaxy.

If this is correct would this affect the calculations of the MAGI or would it make no difference?
macausland
 
Posts: 339
Joined: 3:17 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Index

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 115 guests