Trade Secrets

Current topics

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Boreades » 11:59 pm

Re The seal blubber theory of burning Venus Pool fire pits

Well, yes that's one theory, so is fish oil (like cod liver oil). Either will fit the bill of a fuel source for the much-ignored subject of beaconage. That is, the payment made by fisherman to hermits/monks/priests (depending on the era) who looked after holy hill-top beacon sites (at least). Although, given how small a hilltop beacon light can be, and still be visible for many miles out to sea, I'm wondering about how big Venus Pools are in comparison, and why would you need such a big pool and such a big fire? If indeed Venus Pools were beacon sites. Perhaps they were oil production areas for the hilltop beacons?
Boreades
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Mick Harper » 5:36 pm

Extract Fifty-Six

No matter how much money is spent on a transport infrastructure it is completely useless without road signs. Even catching a train requires someone able to read the destination board. In literate times this is not a problem because writing is permanent. Everyman is his own gazeteer. It doesn’t even require the traveller be literate since the information is always at hand.

But in illiterate times, nobody local can tell you which way to go beyond the next village or two and even if someone did happen to know the way to where you were going, how far would you get memorising his instructions? We've all been there. “Did he say second left or bear left after the white house ... was that the house he meant, it was whitish ... ?” Since all journeys are one-way logic paths, the next village or two is about as far as it is safe to go using such methods.

For any substantial distance there is always one unavoidable problem. Take the basic example of travelling west along Britain’s Pilgrim’s Way which starts from the Kent ports, joins up at Canterbury and then crosses southern Britain to Winchester and Avebury. Every time there is a road junction the traveller has decisions to make: 'Is this the road I need (since I am not actually going to either Winchester or Avebury)' or 'Which one of these two roads is the Pilgrim’s Way since I am going to Winchester (or Avebury).'

At the very least you’ll need somebody to tell you which branch, Winchester or Avebury, to take. It is no use saying, “I am a professional traveller so I will know that Winchester is the more southerly of the two branches.” How will you know, after the hundred or so branches you have already passed, that this one happens to be the Winchester/Avebury cut-off?

Fortunately there is a Megalithic expert on hand to tell you.
Mick Harper
 
Posts: 929
Joined: 10:28 am

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Mick Harper » 11:02 am

Extract Fifty-Seven

In fact there is a choice of experts. One model is the ‘lock-keeper’s cottage” solution. Since travellers turn up at any time of the night or day, the post has to be manned twenty-four hours a day which means somebody permanently there who, though with light duties, is obliged to turn out at any time. The duties, which consist essentially of saying “Winchester to your left, Avebury to the right” are certainly light but living there does entail providing the chap (or as pointed out in the witches section of The Megalithic Empire, more likely a beldame) with a house.

A fairly expensive option since, it would appear, that to ensure that this traveller reaches this intersection it will be necessary to ‘man’ all intersections between Canterbury and this point. The alternative is to dispense with the house-and-garden and employ three people on eight hour shifts which is presumably why lock-keepers' cottages are a preferred solution.

Except of course there are no lock-gates so why not dispense with the people altogether and employ avian signposts? It is remarkabley easy to teach crows to talk and indeed the entire Crow Family (the corvidae) appear to have traits that would seem to indicate that they have somehow acquired over the millennia a usefulness to the Megalithic System that goes a little bit further than the usual human-bird interchange of sharing milk bottles with blue tits.

The ability to talk is one of these corvidian traits, and to talk with somewhat more discrimination than is the case with other less gifted bird species that can merely parrot. Hence to train a corvid to fly down, perch on a conveniently sited post and say, “Winchester to your left, Avebury to the right” is not a difficult solution to the lock-gate problem.

Nor an expensive one from the Megalithics' point of view since the bird will not say a thing until the traveller has provided a bit of bird-food. Actually the exchange could be rather profitable for the Megalithic operators since for some unfathomable reason corvids have a penchant for taking gewgaws and hiding them in a safe place. This behaviour is not, as it is with birds in the wild, either to impress mates or to store food for hard times, so one can only conjecture that the behaviour has been induced by some other agency than nature. Collecting tolls is all in a day's work.

And talking of remarkable traits, corvids can recognise individual human beings after an absence of seven years so one really wouldn’t recommend trying to get away without paying.

One hesitates to wonder whether a corvid could train its own offspring to take over the family business but it is certainly the case that technically one bird could operate a number of posts over a particular area. But ‘crows’ have other long-distance attributes that Megalithics might find useful. They have the weird habit of laying out stones in straight lines and get mighty irritated when these are interfered with. It would seem that laying out leylines by using aerial assistants rather than chain-boys and surveyors on the ground is a definite possibilty.

But of course laying out pebbles at sea is not a sound option so here the birds will be put to rather different uses.
Mick Harper
 
Posts: 929
Joined: 10:28 am

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Boreades » 4:57 pm

Mick Harper wrote:Hence to train a corvid to fly down, perch on a conveniently sited post and say, “Winchester to your left, Avebury to the right” is not a difficult solution to the lock-gate problem.


Let's apply a little foresight to the situation. Imagine it's a four-way crossroads. Travellers can arrive from any one of four directions. With the same murder of crows policing the intersection, it's pot luck (or 1:4 chance) which path is correct if “Winchester to your left, Avebury to the right” is all they say. There has to be a more unique encoding. Maybe the paths have coloured posts and the crows call the colour as well as the name? Or they are tagged with a symbol repeated on sign posts? Your guess.
Boreades
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby macausland » 9:48 pm

and when the rooks turn up?
macausland
 
Posts: 339
Joined: 3:17 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Boreades » 10:02 pm

macausland wrote:and when the rooks turn up?


Maybe it's a Castling move?
Boreades
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Boreades » 10:04 pm

Boreades wrote:
macausland wrote:and when the rooks turn up?


Maybe it's a Castling move?


The notation for castling, in both the descriptive and the algebraic systems, is 0-0 with the kingside rook and 0-0-0 with the queenside rook. (In PGN, O-O and O-O-O )

O-O-O matches the triplet alignments of hilltop enclosures of TME significance.
Boreades
 
Posts: 2113
Joined: 2:35 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby macausland » 1:59 pm

Megalithic chess. Wonderful. So that's what Stonehenge was all about. Circular chess pieces and the game left unfinished.

Perhaps the bishops were the original monks looking after the fires along with the hag queen?
macausland
 
Posts: 339
Joined: 3:17 pm

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby Mick Harper » 5:33 pm

Extract Fifty-Eight

The crow’s nest on a ship is familiar enough, as is the raven on the prow of the Viking long boat. What has been lost over the years though is just how useful members of the Crow Family have been to ancient sailors. Perhaps the most basic relationship between man and corvid is represented by the chough which is distinctive by virtue of its brightly coloured, usually red, bill and legs.

In prime maritime Megalithic territory, along the western coasts of Britain, the chough nests along the cliffs and, by its spectacular aerial manoeuvring and loud cries, is a clear harbinger for incoming ships that dangerous land is nearby.

Whether this behaviour is merely useful to man or was assisted by the hand-of-man is not knowable now but at any rate the human half of the relationship seems to have been grateful enough: the chough appears on the Cornish coat of arms. The legend has it that King Arthur did not die but was transformed into a Red-billed Chough, hence killing the bird was unlucky.

All very routine perhaps but according to Wiki “the Red-billed Chough was formerly reputed to be a habitual thief of small objects from houses ... ” which is either a quite baffling piece of behaviour from a bird that naturally has no connection with houses at all or is a sign that this particular subspecies has an ethology that is in part Megalithically inspired.

The remainder of the sentence is perhaps the real giveaway “... including burning wood or lighted candles, which it would use to set fire to haystacks or thatched roofs”. This is pretty amazing for any bird much less one that spends its life at sea. Unless of course it has some role in lighting the Venus Pool firepits. Now that would be useful.
Mick Harper
 
Posts: 929
Joined: 10:28 am

Re: Trade Secrets

Postby spiral » 7:45 pm

macausland wrote:Megalithic chess. Wonderful. So that's what Stonehenge was all about. Circular chess pieces and the game left unfinished.

Perhaps the bishops were the original monks looking after the fires along with the hag queen?


On the continent the bishops are jokers. Alekhine the ex world champion, was once playing a game with a passenger on a train who did not know his fame. His opponent said that he had the advantage of the two jokers.

Alekhine advised him that two jokers were good but three jokers were bad.

You ain't gonna understand it if you don't play chess.......Or the megalithic role of Jack.
spiral
 
Posts: 228
Joined: 8:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Index

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests