hvered wrote:Do you happen to know if there's a masonic connection?
S'funny you should ask that. I've been mulling over this Emperor Diocletian connection. Logically, it makes no sense, as he (according to orthodozy) -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diocletian - "was a Roman emperor from 284 to 305" . Presumably 284 to 305 AD, and a long while after Brutus is supposed to have waded ashore in Totnes.
After having dragged the Roman Empire back from the brink of collapse and stabilising it for c.100 years, what did he do?
Diocletian left the imperial office on 1 May 305, and became the first Roman emperor to voluntarily abdicate the position. He lived out his retirement in his palace on the Dalmatian coast, tending to his vegetable gardens.Going on gardening leave? How very British!
Anyway, this story of Diocletian and his 33 fornicating daughters keeps appearing all over the place. e.g.
the myth states that the Roman Emperor Diocletian had 33 wicked daughters whom he married off to 33 husbands who curbed their unsettling ways. However the daughters were so wicked, led by the eldest sister Alba, they plotted to cut the throats of their husbands as they slept. As punishment for this crime, they were set adrift in a boat with a half year’s rations of food, shunned forever. They drifted ashore the isles of what later became “Albion” (named after the eldest).Ref:
http://downedrobin.blogspot.co.uk/2014/ ... -fail.htmland
http://www.technogypsie.com/faerie/?tag=diocletianBut where's the explanation? Why are there 33 daughters, and no mention of any mother(s) or sons? Never mind how any boat could drift from Rome to Britain. It's ridiculous! The only other place I know of with 33 as a symbolic number is the (supposed) 33 degrees of Scottish Rite Freemasonry. If we play with that notion, - "Goëmagot (Gogmagog), who stood in stature twelve cubits" (or the pair of them) - could allude to the twin pillars of Boaz and Jachin which stood in the porch of Solomon's Temple, the first Temple in Jerusalem.
From there, it's a leap. I'll offer a rather feeble suggestion that the whole "Gog and Magog in London" story might be part of an allegorical tale that explains how Freemasonry was established in Britain as the New Jerusalem, transplanted from Troy/Babylon/Israel.
I say feeble because the 33 degrees are associated with Scottish Rite Freemasonry, not the English version, which only has three degrees (or four, if you count the Royal Arch degree), and I don't know why the Guildhall in London would be associated with Scottish Rite Freemasonry, unless we take another leap and start on the Temple area of London as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple,_LondonActually, in this feeble house of cards, the strongest possibility is via the Roman Army. Was Diocletian a masonic Grand Master? I've no idea, but Freemasonry in England, Scotland, Ireland and France has propogated / survived in arduous times most strongly via military regiments. The miltary connection is also a serious explanation for how Freemasonry got off to such a strong start in the USA, and why the British miltary leaders never seriously tried to defeat their US fraternal brethren.