It wasn't just in the Daily Wail the BBC has also reported it as well as other sites.
This site reckons it would have been easy enough to push them down a clay slipway.
http://www.archaeology.org/news/1335-13 ... -age-boats
The first confusion kicks in because they say South Wales and people might assume it's on the south coast, on the Bristol Channel. In fact Monmouth is many miles up river.
My instinct is that anyone clued-up about shipbuilding will look at those three channels and say "Slipway".
hvered wrote:The first confusion kicks in because they say South Wales and people might assume it's on the south coast, on the Bristol Channel. In fact Monmouth is many miles up river.
My instinct is that anyone clued-up about shipbuilding will look at those three channels and say "Slipway".
Monmouth is well situated for passing trade being just east of Offa's Dyke and on the Wye, seemingly the highest navigable point. I'm not sure though that a slipway automatically denotes shipbuilding.
Mick Harper wrote:With both rivers eroding the land between them at a rapid rate it is inconceivable that the present situation could have been arrived at if the two rivers had been left to their own devices. If then this is recent there must be at least a prime facie possibility of human intervention.
spiral wrote:Mick Harper wrote:With both rivers eroding the land between them at a rapid rate it is inconceivable that the present situation could have been arrived at if the two rivers had been left to their own devices. If then this is recent there must be at least a prime facie possibility of human intervention.
In general, orthodoxy seems quite happy to accept accept extensive chalk mining in Kent and Norfolk, yet your "Westerners" appeared not to have noticed the benefits of chalk (except for giant horsey pictures).
Probably doesn't fit the celtic myth.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest